IMPROVED GLYCEMIC CONTROL WITH USE OF CONTINUOUS SUBCUTANEOUS INSULIN INFUSION COMPARED WITH MULTIPLE INSULIN INJECTION THERAPY
David S. H. Bell, MB, FACE, and Fernando Ovalle, MD
ABSTRACT
Objective: To compare, in a long-term study, glycemic control by means of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII or insulin pump therapy) versus multiple insulin injection therapy (MIIT) in routine clinical practice.
Methods: We identified, from a search of medical records, all active patients (N = 90) receiving CSII who had previously received MIIT. The primary objective was to compare the mean glycemic control, as documented by frequent measurements of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), during the 3-year period before initiation of CSII versus the mean glycemic control during the 3-year period after the first year of CSII. We included all patients for whom we had sufficient data for at least 1 year for both the pre- and post-CSII periods and only those patients who had received MIIT before CSII (N = 58). To eliminate potential biases, we excluded HbA1c values for the first year after initiation of CSII therapy.
Results: For the entire study group, the mean HbA1c ± standard error for the 3-year period before insulin pump therapy (during MIIT) was 8.4 ± 0.2% versus a mean HbA1c of 7.7 ± 0.1% for the 3-year period after the first year of CSII. This 0.7% improvement in HbA1c was statistically significant (P = 0.001). Of the 34 patients with HbA1c values above 8.0% during MIIT, the mean HbA1c decreased from 9.2 ± 0.2% with use of MIIT to 8.2 ± 0.2% with CSII (P = 0.0006). In the 17 patients with HbA1c values above 9.0% during MIIT, the mean HbA1c declined from 10.0 ± 0.3% with use of MIIT to 8.4 ± 0.3% with CSII (P = 0.0006).
Conclusion: We conclude that implementation of intensive insulin therapy with CSII improves glycemic control, even in patients in whom MIIT has previously been used to its maximal effect. (Endocr Pract. 2000;6:357-360)