Main Page
About Us

News


BossboyX Productions

November 2005 Updates

The Rent... is too damn high!

Tuesday, November 1st, 2005
 
Nady Fertuesdays presents... a Funky Friday Production..
 
Inside the NBA part 2 - go west, big man!
 
Before I begin, I must pay a visit to the dreaded Department of Lame Excuses to excuse away my tardiness, and believe me, this one is a lame one.  Usually I complete the Funky Friday in the early hours of Friday morning, having planned most of the column out at work on Thursday night.  However, this week, I had Thursday off and worked Friday night instead, and it threw me off of my game.  Thus, I postponed the writing to Saturday morning.  I now return us to our regularly scheduled Funky Friday.
 
(Or maybe not.  That paragraph and a lot of the next ones up through the Seattle SuperSonics were written on Saturday morning, right before my internets broke for quite sometime.  I went to bed, woke up 6 hours later, and they were still broken.  As such, I went to my friend Jeff's house to celebrate his birthday.  I got him the director's cut DVD of "The Warriors".  The upside of all this is that I'll try to work in some jokes from The Warriors in the part about the GS Warriors.  The next day I got sick and took some NyQuil and went under for 12 hours.  So you get it on Tuesday instead, which is oddly appropriate since the NBA starts tonight.  Now, I'll let you get back to reading what I wrote Saturday morning while I get back to writing the rest on Tuesday morning).
 
To tie some loose ends, I'm going to take a rain check on the goat pics for Melanie because 1) we just received Becker's, and they need time to set in, and 2) one of the pics was removed at her request, and I have a sneakin' suspicion that the same fate would befall the one I picked out.  In its place, I have a true goat story to share.  Last fall, I went to the local orchard with my mom, sisters, and nieces and nephews.  The orchard has a nice little petting zoo that the toddlers very much wanted to see.  This day, my nephew Simon, two year old son of my sister Jessica, had taken a particular liking to me, and found I was really good at playing a game that involved running way ahead of the rest of the family, and doubling back to them, looking at the animals in reverse order.  During one of our trips, a very small black goat came out to be petted by us.  Simon and I stopped to pet it, when Simon noticed its long, white goatee.  Luckily for all involved, he was way too smart to start tugging on the goat's prominent facial hair, and instead looked at me and pointed at my own impressive goatee and started giggling to himself.  He then decided he wanted the goat to play our running game too, but the goat really had other ideas that involved generally being cute around people so he could be petted.  Regrettably, I have since fallen from my position of favored uncle to Simon due to my sister Casey and brother-in-law Joe moving across the street from Jessica and Simon.  Now Uncle Joe and his wicked sideburns get the coolest uncle/facial hair combo.
 
And with that, it's time to finish up that ambitious NBA preview I started last week.  This week, I turn to the Western Conference.  It probably won't take me as long, because I pay far less attention to the West than I do the East, and there are fewer extremely crappy teams to make fun of.  Nevertheless, I must carry on.
 
The Northwest Division:
 
1.  Denver Nuggets -- For some reason, I'm unable to mentally consider the Nuggets as a good team.  I realize the talent is there, and the coaching has been good, and they made great strides through the latter part of last season, but they still seem like a second-rate team to me.  Maybe it's because they've always been so gimmicky with their young guys and short guys and guys with only one name or crazy hair.  Or maybe it's their sudden loss of young guys or guys with only one name or guys with crazy hair.  Either way, I'm going to predict a division title and first round exit.  Make it so.
 
Good stuff:  According to USA Today, they have the best home court fan experience in the league.  That should count for something.  They have those slick and shiny powder blue uniforms too, and they somehow fail to look like total sissies in them.
 
Bad Stuff:  It seems like I'm unable to find players on this team I like.  Their most exciting player is Earl Boykins.  That can't be good.
 
2.  MInnesota Timberwolves -- Everyone seems to be hating on the Wolves these days, but I think they made some really good offseason moves.  First, they got rid of Spree.  Second, they got rid of Cassell.  This is part of the "addition by subtraction" theory, and I posit that such a theory is just Taoist enough to work.  Running an NBA franchise is like cooking a small fish.  Can you keep the Spirit and embrace the One without departing from them?  He who stands on tiptoes is not steady.
 
Good:  Fewer strong offensive options means that KG gets fed the ball more, which means that the best player in the NBA will have a more prominent role in the team.  I figure that to be an improvement.  Yes, the roster is improved by making it worse.  As Master Lao Tzu states, "Fine weapons are instruments of evil.  They are hated by men."
 
Bad:  The Wolves have the ability to run an All-White Guy lineup.  This will surely result in problems.
 
3.  Utah Jazz -- The Jazz are a wild card.  An X-Factor, if you will.  Last year they sucked, but they had injury problems and no point guard.  This year, they have a rookie point guard and people are healthy.  So they may be good.  Or they may get hurt again.  I just don't know.
 
Good:  Andrei Kirilenko.  Here are some fun facts about Kirilenko.  Andrei means "Andrew" in Russian, and that happens to be my name.  Kirilenko once sported a mullet, just like me.  Kirilenko also once sported a bizarre, mohawk mullet combo, similar to how I once had a flat-top mullet combo, which was bar-none the most interesting hairstyle in recorded history.  I'm not sure, but I think "Kirilenko" might actually translate to "Bass-driven dance rhythm".  I have decided that AK-47 is most definitely a member of my karass somehow, and have subsequently made him my favorite non-Pacer NBA player.

Bad:  Carlos Boozer is a lying tool that nobody should like.  He also slouches on defense.
 
4.  Seattle SuperSonics -- They didn't really make any changes, but I still think they're headed downward.  I think this is primarily because teams that don't make changes don't get talked about, and talked about teams are usually considered to be good.  This is a rule, and so shall it stay.
 
Good:  Ray Allen decided to stay for a gigantic deal.  That was nice of him.  They are still probably the best shooting team in the league, and who doesn't get excited by lots of jump shots?
 
Bad:  Don't they have some weird collection of talentless tall white dudes playing center, or am I remembering this wrong?  It's only going to end in disaster.  I better doublecheck that.  It turns out they have two talentless tall white dudes, one at forward and one at Center, and then a black rookie who regrettably happens to be French.  I'm really not making friends with this analysis, so I think I should just sum it up as "Frontcourt still developing."
 
5.  Where was I?  My internets broke for 2 days, and I've lost my flow....  oh yeah
 
5.  Portland Trail Blazers -- The Portland Trail Blazers are flipping insane.  A couple of years ago, Zach Randolph had to hide at Dale Davis' house because he was afraid Ruben Patterson was going to kill him.  Players are always being arrested or threatening to sue their teammates.  The front office repeatedly drafts high school kids who are not exactly ready to play in the NBA.
 
Good:  There's always the drama, and Portland fans can watch new talent get developed so it can be shipped to another team.  Oh, and Nate McMillan is coaching them after turning Seattle around last year.  So he'll be around to stick it to Seattle when they play.  That'll be fun.
 
Bad:  In a roster full of problem children, Darius Miles stands out above the rest.  Every team he has ever played on seems to have problems with him.
 
The Southwest Division
 
1.  San Antonio Spurs -- The Spurs used the offseason to basically do nothing and watch a bunch of really good old players sign up to win a championship.  The end result?  A choke late in the playoffs.  You heard it here first.  The 2006 NBA Champs are going to be Not the Spurs.
 
Good:  Pretty much everyone on this team is a proven talent worthy of a strong NBA contract.  And they have a good coach.  And a supportive fan base.  And cool looking black jerseys that say "Hey, we were black.  We don't mess around."
 
Bad:  Bruce Bowen karate chops people on the forearms and calls it "strong perimeter defense."  Bad karma is going to catch up soon, probably late in the Playoffs, say, in the second round, when they choke and fall to whatever team upset Denver.
 
2.  Dallas Mavericks -- I think I like the Mavericks.  I read Mark Cuban's web log on occasion and it's usually quite insightful and intelligent.  The organization seems well run.  Plus, they've understood the concept that every Indiana team has mastered:  if every year the team is good enough to be a contender but falls a little short of winning it all, fans will keep coming back saying "It's our year this year, I know it!"  Constant money maker.  No costly 'rebuilding" to do, no pressure to actually win.
 
Good:  Dirk Nowitzki.  His name is Dirk.  Naming your child after medieval weaponry can only enhance his or her coolness.  And on top of that, Nowitzki.  A 'z' and a 'k' side by side.  Zs and Ks might be the second and third most intimidating letters of the alphabet after Xs.  This, by the way, is about as meaningful analysis of his basketball game that you can find.  During the playoff series against the Rockets last year, the two conflicting theories going in were "The Rockets are totally going to shut Nowitzki down" and "The Rockets clearly will have no answer for Nowitzki."  It is for this reason that I, a tool that knows virtually none of the actual mechanics of the game of basketball, am able to write a legitimate sounding preview.  And the reason this makes it into this section is that Mark Cuban derided the overuse of nonsensical cliches such as "wanting it more" and "stepping up" on his web log the other day.
 
Bad:  Did I mention that winning a championship would seriously hurt their marketing plan?  It's not in the works.
 
3.  Houston Rockets:  It's a good year for Nando, as all three teams from his home state of Texas are going to be top-notch this year.  I put the Rockets at the bottom because they are basically just T-Mac and Yao, with a few other dorks along for the ride, unlike the Mavs, who contain a superstar in the Dirkster, a sidekick in Jason Terry, and then some exciting role players like Josh Howard and Marquis Daniels.  I don't think I can name any other player for the Rockets off the top of my head, so they go to third.
 
Good:  Yao.  He doesn't complain about calls against him.  He works hard to improve to silence his critics.  He still retains his Chinese roots.  Go Yao.
 
Bad:  T-Mac.  Despite the fact that he's really, really, really frickin' good at basketball, T-Mac has weird, googly eyes that seem to stare in two different directions, and that just creeps me out.
 
 
4.  Memphis Grizzlies:  Can the Grizz bring home some tofu bacon this year?  Probably not, but I bet they can finally win a playoff game.  In fact, if the matchups fall in the right way, they might even get to beat up on Denver in the first round.  I'm pretty optimistic for the Honky Tonk Guys this year because like MInnesota, they decided to add by subtracting, and as an added bonus, they sent all of their crappy problem players to the Miami Heat, which strikes me as the best of all situations.
 
Good:  The Grizzlies seem to have a lot of good players.  Which is good.
 
Bad:  The Grizzlies seem to lack really really good players.  Which is bad.  If they had a superstar and demoted Pau Gasol to fan favorite sidekick, this team would be a real powerhouse.
 
5.  New Orleans/Oklahoma City Hornets (NOOCH):  NOOCH sounds suspiciously like a sinister organization that James Bond would have to defeat.  This acronym alone makes the former New Orleans Hornets much cooler than they've ever been in the past.
 
Good:  NOOCH's management have shown their commitment to winning a championship this year:  the NBA Slam Dunk Championship.  They traded away their former All-Star center, Jamaal Magloire, in order to get Desmond Mason, a high quality slam dunk artist, from the Bucks.  It's an open secret that he's going to take a roster spot away from That Bastard, Chris Andersen, after he humiliated the franchise by missing 8 million dunks during last year's contest.  They also return Smith the Loser from last year's dunk contest.  Between Mason, Smith, and possibly Andersen, they should be a lock for the Dunk Championship.  In fact, they even drafted Chris Paul to practice alley oops.  After that, the 10 games they win this season will be gravy.  Oh, and they don't have Baron Davis anymore (See Warriors, Golden State).
 
Bad:  They let Dan Dickau walk, despite proclaiming earlier that they believe in him.  Also, the Southwest is appropriately the mirror image of the SE.  While the Miami Heat are the one good team in a crappy division, the poor Hornets get to be the lone horrible squadron in a division full of playoff teams.  Buenas Noches, NOOCHes.
 
The Pacific Division.  There are 5 teams in the NBA located on the Pacific Coast, three of which play in the Pacific Division.
 
1.  Sacramento Kings -- Somebody has to win this division, and I'm going to say it's going to be the Kings.  The Kings aren't great, but they are respectable.  They don't have any glaring weaknesses that I can think of off the bat, so I'm going to go with them.  In fact, I think the Pacific might just be a slightly better version of the Atlantic, which is still slightly pathetic.  For example, while the Nets simply suck least, the Kings actually show some promise.
 
Good:  Their fans really like them.  They had the brains to get rid of perennial loser Chris Webber.  That alone should net them about 10 wins.
 
Bad:  I'm not sure who most of the guys on their roster are, but I assume they'll be riding the pine and it won't matter much.  I kind of wish there was something interesting I could think of to write about the Kings.  Aren't they wearing shimmery, metallic jerseys this year?  That should be a sight.
 
2.  Phoenix Suns -- The Suns are playing without Amare Stoudamire, who is probably the best player on their team and top 5 in the league.  Amare played to Nash's style, and they will really, really miss that.  On the other hand, they have all of Atlanta's draft picks for the next 5 years to build a team around if he can't bounce back from his injury.  That's good.
 
Good:  Steve Nash is Canadian.  And he has floppy hair.  Everyone loves him.  Kurt Thomas is much less well-known and beloved, but he's respectable and hard working nonetheless.
 
Bad:  The high flying Fun Suns of last year are gone, methinks, so there might be plenty of room on the new and not improved Boring Suns' bandwagon come January.  And they released Paul Shirley because they didn't get to see him play because they didn't play him, and any time a sarcastic lanky white dude gets the shaft I take it personally.  I'm not sure if the injury of Amare constitutes an appropriate karmic repercussion or not as of this writing.
 
3.  Los Angeles Clippers -- I noted in the Eastern Conference preview that I tend to be a bastard at times.  This is one of them.  I know of no reason why I should put the Clippers above the Lakers.  I just am.  The roster, as always, shows a lot of promise through emerging young talent and veteran leadership, but history suggests that the Clippers will once again find new and breath-taking methods of sucking. 
 
Good:  They should probably have another high draft pick to throw away next year.  Elton Brand is consistently awesome.  On the plus side, Corey Maggette has improved a lot, but on the other hand, he could still improve a lot more, according to their season review last year. 
 
Bad:  Seriously, they drafted an 18 year old Russian Dude who averaged 6 ppg in a European Junior League?  What the crap are you supposed to say?  Also, we saw how well Sam Cassell will put the team before himself last year.  He'll definitely help out with team chemistry.
 
4.  Los Angeles Lakers -- I hate the Lakers, but not like I hate the Pistons.  See, the Pistons have wronged the Pacers in specific ways, and for that I hate them, both as a team, and individually as people.  The Lakers, on the other hand, are just sort of a vague hatred that doesn't really affect me much, like world hunger.  I hate world hunger, but not enough to type a long invective against it.
 
Good:  The Lakers will probably suck this year.  That's a good thing, I think.
 
Bad:  They traded to get Kwame Brown, who is still undeveloped.  Phil Jackson, while the best at getting lots of really good talent to work together, has a very tenuous record when it comes to developing talent.  Oh, and Kobe Bryant is a rapist.  There should really be no argument to the contrary.  On the day the charges were dropped, Kobe said that he still felt that the sex was consensual, but he understands that the defendant may not agree.  Now, I'm not a literary expert or anything, but doesn't consensual mean that both parties are clearly agreeing to the act?  If you understand that someone might not think something is consensual, it cannot be called consensual.  By definition, really.  Anyone who can cheer for Kobe is a horrible human being.  All Lakers fans, if they wish to save their soul, should just swallow their pride and cheer for that Russian dude on the Clippers this year.
 
5.  Golden State Warriors -- Guess who is not on the Warriors' bandwagon this year?  Lots of people who have presumably consumed too much caffeine too quickly are saying that the Warriors will be downright awesome this year based on last year's late season success.  They won't.  Trust me on this one.  I have but one piece of evidence to offer:  Baron Davis.  The Warriors are building their franchise around Baron Davis.  This, in fact, has been attempted before, and I don't think NOOCH will exactly give you a ringing endorsement of the strategy.  Baron will probably do what he did last year:  Start slow, get injured, get fat, and then win meaningless games at the end of the season so that people talk about how good he is.
 
Good:  They are planning to run a fast-break Phoenix-style offense, which should be fun to watch if it isn't a complete train wreck.  See, the problem with this approach...wait, this is the Good section.  Give me a second...
 
Bad:  The problem with this approach is that it requires the point guard to pass the ball.  Baron Davis prefers to shoot, or drive to the basket and dunk it.  Teammates really just get in his way.
 
More Good:  Baron Davis is having an essay contest in honor of his grandmother, who is the most influential person in his life.  The contest is being judged by the grandmother, meaning that I can't make a simple joke about how the best way to win would be to write 300 words about how Baron Davis is the most influential person in your life.  Speaking of which...
 
More Bad:  The prize of said essay contest is the opportunity to meet Baron Davis.  And didn't his grandma die last year?  I'm hoping this is a different grandma, otherwise my joke in the preceding paragraph would ring true.  In other bad news, the Warriors still seem to use that ridiculous Iron Golem logo, and have one too many disappointing draft picks with funny names on their roster to truly be effective.
 
And because I promised a tie-in with "The Warriors" the movie, not the crappy basketball team, I offer this:  The Golden State Warriors are more like the Baseball Furies than their cinematic namesake:  they look really intimidating at first glance, they seem to have all the right weapons, but they have horrible team chemistry and no leadership.  Seriously, in the movie, 10 Baseball Furies, armed with baseball bats, are beaten up by 4 unarmed Warriors, and one of the Warriors gets knocked out before the fight really even starts.  In every shot during the fight scene, a Fury can be seen standing aside and impotently holding his bat doing nothing while one of his gang brothers gets the crap beat out of him by a Warrior.  Inexcusable.
 
 
So that finishes my NBA preview.  Hope everyone enjoyed it.  Friday I'll write about something else, assuming I'm conscious and the internets are working properly.
Wednesday, November 2nd, 2005

Humpin' it with Becker on the Day of the Dead

The following entry was inspired by the Bulwer-Lytton Fiction Contest. ( http://www.bulwer-lytton.com/ ).  My attempt at writing the worst fiction possible.  Maybe I'll submit it for next year.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It was a dark and stormy night.  Lightning crashed outside like a 1978 Ford Pinto crashing through a pane glass storefront. I awoke with a start, my heart jumping a beat like a Mexican jumping a border fence. I fumbled for my glasses in the darkness.

"It's frickin' blacker than Africa in here," I muttered as a stubbed my toe on the dresser. It was a dark and swirly pine.

There was no way I was going to fall back asleep with my heart racing faster than a Mexican running for the border. Besides, there was still the matter of the Vanderberg case.

I slowly thumbed the wheels on my briefcase's lock until they reached my secret combination: 187. That's what I had to yell on a mothafuckin' cop once, back in the day. But that's a story for another dark and stormy night, only perhaps a darker, but slightly less stormy one.

I rifled through the papers inside, stopping like a nasty hair clog at a polaroid picture. The man was jovial and happy, like a clown, but in his eyes you could see he was a bit sad, like a clown. He had a lampshade on his head and a martini in his hand. Jack Vanderberg, the night before he went missing. He and Sharon (that's his wife, yo) were at a party celebrating her brother's appointment to the position of State Comptroller. Could there be a connection there? We all knew about the seedy underworld of Comptrolling. The last four men to hold the position all met their untimely comeuppance. They were comeupped with the force of a typhoon and the swiftness of a VW Rabbit.

I reached another photo and stared at it with the glassy-eyed stare of one of those dolls with glass eyes. Sharon was the kind of vivacious woman that made you feel vital and alive. The kind of flaming red hair that gives men whiplash on the street. Skin smoother than Superman's. And that dress. Oh, that dress. It clung to her like an individually sliced cheese wrapper. Nipples you could hang your hat and coat on, respectively.

My loins burned for her, but that might have just been the burning sensation when I peed. I just couldn't be sure about anything these days...

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Song Dowload of the Week:
Queen - Don't Stop Me Now

(Featured prominently in Shaun of the Dead)

Friday-Saturday, November 4th/5th, 2005
 
Fun Key Fridays
 
Fun preliminary Funky Friday fact:  I started this entry two hours ago, and this is all I've written.  This is because A) I am extremely good at wasting time on the internets and B) I'm an idiot.  Onward.
 
Earlier in the week, our Fearless Leader Frenado made quite the declarative statement about your humble columnist (I maintain, by the way, that I am a columnist.  My column just happens to be much wider than most.).   Anyways, take it away, Mr. Fertody:
 
"if something aint truly 'Hoosier', [Funk] aint gonna like it. You can quote me on that. "
 
Done and done.  Quite the claim.  To refute it, I have been compiling a list of things about my very beloved home state that, for one reason or another, I just don't understand or enjoy.
 
"Wait a second, Andy.  This won't exactly refute Nando's point that you don't like things that are not truly Hoosier.  It merely points out that your likes are possibly a subset of truly Hoosier things, neither proving nor refuting the issue.  To thoroughly refute it, you'd have to point out something that you like that is not Hoosier in the slightest."
 
Ooh, good point, imagined reader.  However, a column of such things would be much harder to write and probably less interesting to read.  After all, I don't think anybody would care to hear about how J.K. Rowlings has absolutely no connection to Indiana.  It's just not riveting material.  But since you insist, I'll oblige.  The Harry Potter books have absolutely no connection to Indiana.  Neither, as far as I know, does the absolutely awesome band They Might Be Giants.
 
1.  Auto Racing:  I can understand the excitement behind events such as monster truck rallies or demolition derbies or those cool Excitebike-style motorbike races with the jumps and the mud pits, but cars driving around in circles (or giant rectangles, in the case of the Indianapolis Motor Speedway) does not excite me in the slightest.  NASCAR, F-1, or IRL, I care not.  I find them all equally boring.  Back in the days of Nando's ISIS test site, Becker pointed out that in Europe they race on alpine roads in horrible conditions.  I think that would be much more watchable than prissy pampered rednecks driving around in circles.
 
2.  John Mellencamp:  I feel conflicted here.  John Mellencamp is a god among men in my home state, and I've heard his praises sung by those dwelling outside the borders of the Hoosier state.  I'm very lukewarm toward his musical career.  In his earlier years, he was much better, but I feel his career has been in a steady decline.  In 8th grade I purchased Mr. Happy Go Lucky and was thoroughly disappointed outside of the catchy hit "Key West Intermezzo (I Saw You First)".  I realized at that point that there wasn't much left in the tank, creatively.  I have no problems with a rocker losing his touch after 15 years of recording music; it's almost to be expected in all but the most exceptional of cases.  The problem is that Mellencamp has gone the Madonna route and gotten more and more pretentious about his 'art', and more defensive about criticism.  He routinely claims at concerts that he's going to refuse to play the classics at his concerts, despite the fact that people buy the ticket to hear "Jack and Diane" and not "Your Life is Now."  I prefer to think of the John Mellencamp that recorded the highly jammin' and delightfully offensive "I Need a Lover" under the hilariously awesome stage name Johnny Cougar.  Also, I think "Jack and Diane", with its message that old age is a big waste of time and not worth living through (Oh yeah, life goes on long after the thrill of living has gone) should make my abortive list of hit songs with really strange premises I started a couple months ago.  Also, I find "Small Town" to be more than a little bit idealized, as small town life is actually pretty depressing at times and closer to Springsteen's "My Hometown" lament.
 
::Digression::
And since I mentioned Madonna, I must confess that I'm a little bit astounded by her latest offering.  I have tragically underestimated her abilities.  When the hopelessly uncatchy and annoying "Ray of Light" was released, I thought "Finally.  This is it.  This song is so bad surely she will have no fans left."  Wrong.  Then comes the atrocious cover of Don McLean's "American Pie".  "Such an affront to the quality music of yesteryear should mark the end of a horribly over-extended career," I hope in horrified wonder.  But it was not to be, for soon came the gem that was "Music."  I think "Wow, this monstrosity will surely destroy her remaining fanbase.  It cannot possibly get worse than this."  Then it does, thanks to the excessively pretentious and utterly pointless "Die Another Day."  "Surely the reservoir of suck has been drained," supposes I.  Then, to my relief, "American Life" is pretty much universally hated and ignored.  "Finally," sighs I, "Madonna will bother us no more. Critiquing American life in the early Aughts and the Bush Administration should be shooting fish in the barrel, but she managed to screw it up."  Then she kissed Britney Spears at the VMA, and I laugh "Ha.  Madonna is grasping at straws.  Stick a fork in her, Jerry.  She's done."  And so it seemed.  But on Thursday as I was driving to work, Local Pop Station proclaimed that they were playing Madonna's latest single.  Instinctively, I reach for the pre-sets, but then I think, "How can it possibly be worse?  I must be my open-minded self and give it a chance."  Five minutes later, when it finally stopped, I turned off the radio, and my jaw was still on the floor when I arrived at 1 & 70 Shell.  My preceding coworker said "Andy, you're not looking so good.  Are you all right?"  "No, I most certainly am not," came my quiet, humbled reply.  Madonna, it turns out, has combined her vapid lyrics and her unimpressive techno beats with an ABBA sample.  And not just any ABBA song, but a sample from "Gimme Gimme Gimme (A Man After Midnight)", an annoying song even when compared with ABBA's other works.  I did it again.  Someday, I might stop being surprised at how much worse the current Madonna song is compared with the previous one, but in the meantime I hold out hope that at some point she has to hit rock bottom.
::End Digression::
 
3.  College Basketball:  Like the NBA, only less talented.  Indiana natives go nuts over IU v Purdue.  Personally, I like to watch the team that unites our homeland, the Pacers, go out and beat on the infidels from beyond our borders, quite literally when the opposing team is Detroit.
 
4.  Dan Quayle, his alma mater of DePauw University, and Republicans in general:  Hoosiers have this very distinct apathy when it comes to politics.  The old people are your typical conservatives, but a lot more middle aged and younger types seem to lend toward the libertarian bent that believes that all politicians are equally corrupt and it doesn't matter who you vote for.  Since the Republican Party depends on apathy and ignorance, they always carry the day.  I don't get it.  Also, Dan Quayle is a complete dolt and a disgrace to the 19th State of the Union, and his alma mater is filled with arrogant, self-important upper middle class white kids who have no sense of social justice.
 
On a related political note, I'd like to state that Indiana Senator Evan Bayh should be the Democratic Nominee in 2008.  He's generally been overly centrist for my liking, but the fact that he won reelection with approximately 98% of the vote without running a single ad in a very very red state seems to have given him a spine to actually say bad things about the pres.  Realistically, I see no way that Indiana would not vote for him, and our electoral votes alone would be enough to tip the scales in our favor.
 
5.  Daylight Savings Time.  I think, as a state, we've gotten much stupider lately.  We have adopted daylight savings time as a way to encourage business growth by making it easier to do business in Indiana thanks to a falling back and springing forward.  I'm not sure whether the assured economic prosperity starts now or when we spring forward, but either way I'm sure it's bound to happen and the issue of daylight savings time wasn't brought up to distract from the larger issue that all of our social services are being thrown out in order to give corporations tax breaks from the state to operate in Indianapolis.  At any rate, I still hold that, along with our comrades in Arizona, we were right in thinking that daylight savings time was kinda dumb.
 
6.  A Disturbing Legacy of Slaughtering Indigenous Populations, and then Denying them Tribal Status for the Next 200 Years.  I'm not sure I need to go into much more detail on this one.
 
7.  Idiots that drive Large Vehicles with Confederate Flag license plates:  Large vehicles are disturbingly popular in this state for reasons I cannot fathom, and I'm not talking about those giant Buicks with cloth seats that your grandma probably drives, but rather the oversized pickups and Ford Excursions.  The love of the confederate flag is equally confounding, considering Indiana's status during the War to  Protect States' Rights and Only By a Happy Coincidence Preserve Slavery.  The people who drive them are relative newcomers to the state, moving in during the heyday of the industrial midwest from such exotic locales as Kentucky and Tennessee.  Kentucky and Tennessee, while slave states, weren't exactly Alabama and South Carolina, and Kentucky didn't even bother to secede, choosing to fight against the Stars and Bars.  Why do these people continue to fly them from their gigantic Chevy Silverados?  I don't know.
So hopefully this should partially dispel the myth that I'm a shameful partisan shill for my home state.  I can recognize the bad along with the good.  I feel obliged to present two points of pride for my homestate to counteract the stream of negativity I have unleashed.  First, Amelia Earhart, pioneering aviator brought to an untimely end by Imperial Japan.  Second, Kurt Vonnegut.
 
That'll do for me this week.  Have a good weekend.
Sunday, November 6th, 2005

Sundee's with Nando

Greetings. This is Nando, known to many as FERnando. AKA, the guy who used to write a heck of a lot more than he does nowadays. Regardless, I'm going to take a break from reading about people with mental problems to discuss a few things that i have been thinking about.

Firstly, The great minds that are running the James Bond franchise. Yeah, it took a while, but I'm finally going to unveil my position on this new Daniel Craig character and the direction I am hearing the new film will take James Bond. Firstly, when I heard that the new James Bond was going to be someone other than Pierce Brosnan, I was a bit saddened. I had enjoyed his take on the character- a Connery presence with a Dalton attitude. But, I got over it rather quickly. For several reasons.

To start off, I was rather upset that producers would take back their verbal promise to Pierce that he would be in one last film, however, after all the hoopla that went around in the media this summer, I came to the conclusion that Pierce was also somewhat to blame for the situation. If indeed, he did demand too much money and just assume that the producers would cave in to his demands, he doesn't deserve to pack the P99. I also don't want to be one of those rigid Bond fans who does absolutely nothing but talk about how great the Bond of his day was compared to these losers. Actually, come to think of it, those are mostly Connery fans. I think it's because fans of Roger Moore realize that the movies he made (sans For your Eyes Only) were all so silly, so you could never know if Moore was a good Bond or not since all this wackiness was going on around him that the superspy never encountered before. Fans of Dalton are just too scared of being ridiculed by Connery fans even though it is in my personal opinion that they were both just as good. And fans of Lazenby... well, who are we kidding, right?

Anyway, I started thinking, "this guy can't be James Bond... I mean, he has blonde hair!" As we all know, James Bond never EVER had blonde hair. Not in Goldfinger, not in Risico, not even in Mrs. Gilda's Red House. "It just can't work," I thought to myself. But when I heard that the story was going to be ... well, "not Die Another Day" essentially, I got my hopes up. As you all may remember, producers vowed to bring us "more of the same" after the success of that horrible, horrible film, which lead to many unforgettable inside jokes between Funk and myself.

I'll give this Daniel Craig guy a shot. After all, if the story really is that god, I'm willing to bet that he could be just as good as Dalton.

But last I heard, the producers were going way too overboard with this whole "no funny business" approach to Bond. There won't be a Q or any high tech gadgets... and to make matters worse, Moneypenny won't even show up. Yeah, I know you want to compete with really good spy thrillers like the Bourne Supremacy, but you can't just forget about what makes Bond movies fun. Well, they'll probably hire a chick with big boobs to fill the role of "Samantha Hardknock" or whatever, but that doesn't really appeal to me. To make matters worse, producers are going to take the "batman begins" approach and tell the origins of Bond. I'm pretty sure that after 40 years, we're all familiar with Bond - cool ass English spy, recruited out of the navy, parents died in a mountain climbing accident when he was young. etc. Do we really need to see that? I think that's what made him so mysterious- that we never actually saw any of that, unlike Batman who appears to be more tortured because we saw what happened to him when he was younger... in almost every single movie.

I'm not looking forward to the new Bond movie as much as when I hoped it would be Brosnan's farewell or before I knew that this was a 're-start.' I guess I might still see it, but after the horrible, horrible film that... no, that deserves a third 'horrible'... horrible film that was Die Another Day, you're going to have to convince me that you haven't sacrificed the fun side of Bond to cover your asses for the mistakes you've made with the last movie... which, as I have mentioned was horrible. Except for that brilliant theme song by Madonna...Sigmund Freud? Brilliant!

Let's move on to another topic.

I miss basketball.

Sure, my beloved Timberwolves suck now, but I still wanna watch my other favorite teams. I wanna watch Ben Gordon come in to the game and come back against Rookie of the last year, Emeka Okafor and trounce his Emekas...er Bobcats by coming back from a 25 point deficit. I wanna watch the Pacers destroy every team they play including the friggin heat and Spurs because it's pretty much their year now (so long as Artest can keep his anger in check).

Most importantly, I wanna hear Bill Walton's marvelous rantings on how brilliant the Lakers are and Charles Barkely vehemently state that he doesn't believe in aliens or that man never landed on the moon. The season barely started and already there is a great controversy revolving around comments that Kenny Smif and Chuck said about the Dallas Mavericks. I want to be there too when Charles says something like "Man, why we aint never do the show in Cleveland. Why we gotta stay in Atlanta [where] the Hawks ain't no good!"

Last night was not very kind to me, first the Bulls lost at New Jersey by one single point. I guess I can let it slide since the Nets have what most people will let pass for a team in Vince Carter (Mr. Glass), Jason Kidd (the Wifebeater) and Richard Jefferson (what the hell is he doing with those punks?). But then, Indy lost to AI's Sixers by two points. Funk tells me that for some odd reason, Indy has had difficult beating this squad since time began. My prediction that logically, the T-wolves would fall to the Clippers by 3 points failed to come true... because the wolves lost by a single point.

Tuesday, NOvember 8th, 2005

BBXXX-rated

Brown and Dutton (1995) have analyzed the relationship between self esteem and constant defeat. It's no surprise that there does happen to be such a strong negative correlation between the two. Generally, if you succeed a lot, you feel good about yourself. If you fail a lot, you feel bad about yourself. There's tons of stuff out there on coping with percieved defeats in life. However, I'm here today to talk about something that has rarely been discussed before. That, is the issue of 'undefeat.'

Now wait a minute, here. I know what victory is. I know what defeat is... but what in tarnation is 'undefeat'? Well, if you find yourself asking that question, permit me to explain. Undefeat, is a term that applies to sports teams that have gone unbeaten for a season. Now, this doesn't have to be an entire season, just the season up to a recent point.

How do people deal with 'undefeat'? Well, for this we're going to need an example. Ah, I know! Let's take the colts, who have recently trounced the much hyped Patriots. They are the only team in the NFL who are undefeated up to this point. I don't know much about fan dynamics when it comes to the NFL, but let's just take a very rigid, narrow view for now: You're either with Indy or not. Unsurprisingly, if you're a fan of Indy, you come to feel a sense of vicarious joy. There is this sense of "We" - "we rock", "we are awesome!" etc.

On the other hand, those who are not fans of Indy cope using the following defense mechanisms: 1) denial, 2) projection, 3) withdrawal.

Firstly, there are many who deny the greatness that is the Colts team. To them, the colts are a non-factor that just gets a lot of hype. If you ever encounter someone that uses this mechanism, typical statements that you will hear are: "yeah, the colts are all right, but they still haven't shown they can last the whole season without a defeat." Typically these people will remain naysayers until one of two outcomes occur. First: Indy loses a game. THis will solidify their belief that Indy is not good enough to be a contender. When an important game comes up, they will most likely make references to the few losses that the team has experienced in the past. "they don't have enough fuel" or other nonsensical phrases will abound.

Let's move on. THen there are those people that will project thier own insecurities onto the Colts. These people find reality so unnacceptable, that the only way to cope is by projecting what they perceive to be their (team's) flaws onto the Colts. Everything from, "Colts suck!", to "There's a conspiracy to help the COlts out at every play by the refs" and even, "Petyon Manning is gay". All of these expressions serve as cathartic releases for people's pent up rage by projecting their own fears and obvious flaws onto their rival. This way two things can occur simultaneously: firstly, they can belittle their rival, secondly, they won't have to realize thehorrible truth - that they're really talking about themselves and  even a third - they can be made to feel superior when there is very little reason to.

Finally, there are those fans who will withdraw. This I have found to be very uncommon in sports, but still, there may be the occasional fan who will pout and say things along the lines of, "eh, this doesn't matter anyway. It's just a stupid game, etc". Most of these fans have very little love for thier sports teams and might actually have a need to find success through their team because they cannot find it on their own. Because they feel themselves to be huge failures, these people look to bigger things for feelings of belongingness and success. When these turn out to be huge dissapointments, they dissasociate. In effect, they have been let down again and cannot find the strength to put their trust in anything anymore.

Here now is an excerpt from a convo Funk and I had earlier today:


Funk: My favorite part was when [Bill Simmons] admitted, apparently in all earnestness, that he theorized that the Pats were playing possum for the first half of the season so they could fool the Colts into a fall sense of complacency
Bossboy X: ha ha ha
Bossboy X: I FOOLED YOU!
Funk: those weeks when they sucked?  Just part of their Master Plan to thwart the Evil Peyton
Funk: lol
Bossboy X: see, when we refuse to acknowledge someone's ownership of the circumstances that lead them to their current position in life, we call that "enabling". By refusing to place the onus on Tom Brady and the Pats and instead externalizing the reasons, it takes away from the help that Tom Brady and the Pats can gain by realizing, "ehy, maybe we do kinda suck.. .maybe it's time to fix a few things "
Funk: lol
Funk: wow.  That's amazing.
Bossboy X: i know... this psych stuff is actually helpful for commentary

So there you have it. That's what undefeat can do for you. Note that undefeat evokes more in people than just having an opposing team beat on you, because of the fact that there is very little evidence in the past to support any theory that the undefeated team got lucky against your squad. Chance has increasingly less to do with victories the more you play.

NOw that that's out of my system, let's talk about some things tha have been going on with me. I found out that I wasn't a horrible teacher through the following exchange I had with a female student of mine yesterday:

Student: You know that advisors actually tell us not to take spanish here?
Me: really?
S: yes! They always say that they demand too much from you.
M: Well, there's nothing too wrong with that.
S: Yeah, but my parents are going to be upset if I show up with anything less than an A from a 100-level course.
M: Well, if that happens, you can just say you had a really horrible spanish teacher.
S: Well, that wouldn't be true.

Awe! can you feel the love?

I would also like to mention that I have added yet another catchphrase to my repetoire to keep "When did heget super dino thunder powers?" company. Whenever anyone says something tha can be taken as just plain shocking or surprising, I will shout "By the hilt of Szczerbiak!" in sheer amazement. FOr instance,

"Hey, nando, did you hear about the Spanish Department awarding you the 'most awesome instructor' award?"

"By the Hilt of Szczerbiak, how I've waited for this day!"

and so forth.

So, now, let's talk a litle bit about today's headline.

What we have here, currently, is a goodnews/badnews situation.

I heard that someone in the psych department was looking for a TA for next spring's Human Sexuality course. So, I contacted this person, deserate for funding for my final semester at UW. Well, coming into the whole thing, I knew that the topic was going to be a bit... uncomfortable for me since I don't really discuss sex a whole lot... i guess that's something I never took advanatage of at Wabash. But, anyway, I had a brief meeting with the professor and she was pretty straightforward with me on the issue. Four fifty minute sessions a week on my part- very little work , except for the facilitating. And always having to keep ahead of the students in the readings. She'd even heard of Wabash! My experience and background really helped me as she said she was "impressed with me" and was ready to offer me the job then and there. I have two days to think about it.

So... what's there tothink about? well, as I looked through the textbook... it's really, really... REALLY graphic. I mean... we're talking Cosmopolitan sort of crap ("Try these sexy new techniques with your man") only with pictures... a lot of really graphic pictures. Maybe I'm a prude and that's wrong... lord, I just don't know what to do. I need the money, but this is certainly no going to be as fun of an experience as teaching spanish. ANd the only reason I would do it is because I'm pretty sure that I won't be called back for the Spanish Department.

If I say "no" to the offer, I run the risk of being left without funding of any sort. BUt it's still early so maybe there will be something a little less... graphic out there... but then again,I have no guarantee of that. Lord, I wish that I had more time to decide... like a month or so.

What should I do?

 

 

Wednesday, November 9th, 2005

Humpin' it cuz he can - BECKER!

Salutations and incoming quotations:

1.  The citizens of the United States of America... all possess alike liberty of conscience and immunities of citizenship. It is now no more that toleration is spoken of, as if it was by the indulgence of one class of people that another enjoyed the exercise of their inherent natural rights. For happily the government of the United States, which give to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance, requires only that they who live under its protection, should demean themselves as good citizens, in giving it on all occasions their effectual support.
--
George Washington, 1790 letter to a Jewish community leader


2.  To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.
-- Theodore Roosevelt, 1918 newspaper editorial


3.  You never need an argument against the use of violence, you need an argument for it.
-- Noam Chomsky


4a. 
Today, almost half a century after the publication of the encyclical, new knowledge has led to the recognition of the theory of evolution as something more than just a hypothesis. It is indeed remarkable that this theory has been progressively accepted by researchers, following a series of discoveries in various fields of knowledge. The convergence, neither sought nor fabricated, of the results of work that was conducted independently is in itself a significant argument in favor of this theory.
--
Pope John Paul II, 1996



4b.  We know where scientific reason can end up by itself: the atomic bomb and the possibility of cloning human beings are fruit of a reason that wants to free itself from every ethical or religious link.  But we also know the dangers of a religion that severs its links with reason and becomes prey to fundamentalism.  The faithful have the obligation to listen to that which secular modern science has to offer, just as we ask that knowledge of the faith be taken in consideration as an expert voice in humanity.
-- Cardinal Paul Poupard, head of the Pontifical Council for Culture, 2005


5a.  To summarize: it is a well-known fact that those people who most want to rule people are, ipso facto, those least suited to do it. To summarize the summary: anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job.
-- Douglas Adams, The Restaurant at the End of the Universe


5b.  The last person who should be President is the one who wants it the most. The one who should be picked is the one who should be dragged, kicking and screaming into the White House.
-- Mark Twain?  (paraphrased)


6. 
Laurel and Hardy, that's John and Yoko.  And we stand a better chance under that guise because all the serious people like Martin Luther King and Kennedy and Gandhi got shot.
--
John Lennon


7.  When a thing has been said, and said well, have no scruple. Take it and copy it.
--
Anatole France


---------------------------------------------------------------

Song Download of the Week
Gorillaz - Feel Good Inc

Thursday, November 10th, 2005

Scott's Thusty... so he's gonna drink this

[You know, scott, I really think you're slacking off a bit.]

 

Friday, Noveber 11th, 2005

Funky Fridays - the Everything or Nothing AT ALL! edition

Welcome to Friday, friends and fellow web columnists.
 
Tuesday was Election Day, in case anyone didn't realize it.  I consider myself a rather politically savvy sort of dude, and I couldn't name one race that was going on in my local elections outside of the County Council and the ever-contentious School Board.  This, combined with the fact that my polling place was apparently moved on me and I had no idea where to go to vote, resulted in my contribution to Increased Voter Apathy.
 
This is not to say that there were no important races across the country.  Verily, for a good look at how a modern democracy functions, I need look no further than 30 miles to the east.  The State of Ohio, in all of its infinite wisdom, decides to let its voters decide on critical issues and then go to great lengths to ensure that none of them no what these issues are.  The running joke is the education funding:  in order for schools to get more funding in Ohio, voters have to vote in favor of raising property taxes, which has happened a grand total of zero times, as far as I know.
 
This year, the hot issues were Issues 2, 3, 4, and 5.  What were these issues?  To be honest, going into election day, I had no idea.  However, I did have a vague idea based on the commercials for them that I saw while watching Survivor on the Dayton CBS affiliate with my dad.  On the "Vote No" commercials, people were having duct tape placed over their mouths with ominous warnings about how Issues 2, 3, 4, and 5 would take away their voice in the government.  Vote No or be Duct Taped.  In contrast, the "Vote Yes" commercials promised to hold politicians accountable and eliminate the corruption.  So I was conflicted.  On one hand, I definitely did not want duct tape put on my lips, but on the other hand, I wanted to eliminate corruption.  In case you're dying to know who won, the always well-informed minds of Ohio decided that eliminating corruption was not worth having their mouths duct-taped shut and voted No.
 
So what were these horrid duct-taping reforms?  Glad you asked.  I decided to look into what these mystery ideas were so that I could further use them to make fun of Ohio, and boy did I ever hit the jackpot.
 
Issue 2 involved allowing Buckeyes to vote by mail in order to decrease long-lines and increase voter turnout.  I thought this was the law already.  The thought that a state does not allow mail-in votes never entered my minds, probably because the people capable of imagining a mail-in vote free existence have been already been duct-taped in my home state.
 
On to Issue 3.  Issue 3 was the truly controversial one.  It allowed limiting the money large corporations and special interest groups could dump into a campaign.  I imagine that the reason it lost was because special interest groups and corporations dumped a lot of money into the "vote no" campaign.  But anyways, it's good for the average Ohioan that it didn't pass, because if it did, not only would they not be able to donate millions of dollars to political campaigns, but irritated corporations and special interests would take out their aggression by duct-taping the mouths of the citizens.  Job well done.
 
Issue 4.  Issue 4 and 5 are neck-in-neck for my favorite issue in this contentious campaign.  Issue 4 would overturn the current practice of the Ohio State Legislature that allows incumbents to draw their districts however they want to insure that they win again.  To be quite honest, I can think of neither a way to connect this to duct taping people's mouths nor a reason anyone who is not a member of the Ohio State Legislature could have for opposing this, but again, I'm not an enlightened member of the Buckeye State.  It's probably for the best that they voted that sucker down.
 
Issue 5 really reveals the truly brilliant democratic methods of Ohio.  The issue sought to reform the way election results are calculated.  Currently the election commissioner in charge of counting the votes is a partisan politician who goes on the record to support and campaign for candidates of his party.  Issue 5 wanted to replace him with a bi-partisan commission to oversee election results.  I did see a specific commercial decrying this reform.  It told a horror story about government bureaucrats coming in and deciding elections and then implied that the already corrupt and overbureacratic state government would mess it all up as they've messed up everything pretty regularly for the past decade or so.  So to recap, a measure that was designed to decrease and eliminate election fraud was defeated on the basis that... there's too much election fraud for it to work and the system is better off left alone.  Oh, and those bureaucrats would undoubtedly duct tape your mouths if they got the chance.
 
I really shouldn't have to add that the "Vote No" positions were endorsed entirely by the Ohio Republican Party that has been screwing up the state for the past decade, or that the Vote No campaign vastly outspent the Vote Yes people.  In case any of you are holding out hope that Republicans are not completely moronic, I'd like to disabuse you of that notion.  Republican politicians are concerned solely with gaining more power and keeping what they have, and Republican voters are concerned primarily with finding any evidence whatsoever that they are right even if all other evidence demonstrates quite clearly that they are wrong.
 
To illustrate this fact, I recently had an argument with a Republican on capital punishment.  She is apparently a newly minted Christian, so since I have been raised a Christian and take my religious beliefs very seriously, I pointed out that there is absolutely no way to support capital punishment while following the teachings of Christianity, citing that annoying little Commandment that says "Thou Shalt Not Kill" and ends with a period with no room for weaselly subclauses.  She claimed that capital punishment was self-defense and therefore totally OK with God, and besides the Bible says "an eye for an eye".  To refute this, I first pointed out that a guy locked in an empty room for the rest of his life is no longer a threat to anyone other than himself (she argued he's a threat to his fellow prisoners and we have to execute him for their sake...idiot), and then I turned to a chap named Jesus Christ, the founder of the religion that bears his name, for some extra insight into the matter.  Take it away, Mr. Of Nazareth (Matthew 5:38-78, NIV):
 
"You have heard that it was said, 'Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth.'  But I tell you, Do not resist an evil person.  If someone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also.  And if someone wants to sue you and take your tunic, let him have your cloak as well.  If someone forces you to go one mile, go with him two miles.  Give to the one who asks you, and do not turn away from the one who wants to borrow from you.
 
"You have heard that it was said, 'Love your neighbor and hate your enemy.'  But I tell you:  Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, that you may be sons of your Father in heaven...If you love those who love you, what reward will you get?  Are not even the tax collectors doing that?"  [FYI for any readers lacking Biblical context: tax collectors were extremely greedy and corrupt people, hated by most everyone.  The Romans reportedly attempted to reform them through Issues II-V, but they were voted down due to some commercials involving duct tape.  Anyways, back to Jesus...]  "And if you greet only your brothers, what are you doing more than others?  Do not even pagans do that?  Be perfect, therefore, as your Father is perfect."
 
So how did she react to this clear-cut passage from Jesus that decries revenge, self-defense, and any other motive for violence as immoral?  She said, "Isn't their a verse somewhere that says "Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live?".  In her mind, one random, obscure verse about witches (seriously, WITCHES) negates the founder of the religion stating for several minutes that violence and selfishness in all forms are morally indefensible.  If she were attempting to gain a broader theological understanding, this would be forgivable, but she was attempting to rationalize her political views with her religion when they obviously did not line up.  I didn't respond, because what more could honestly be said?  If Christ isn't taken seriously by Christians, what else could be?  I suppose the way to reconcile the verse is to say that God fully endorses the killing of witches, but in order to do so you must have irrevocable proof that the person is capable and willing to malignantly cast magic spells without the help of a twelve-sided die.
 
Voters are too lazy to find out what Issues 2-5 really are, and self-described religious people are too lazy and apathetic to find out what the tenets of their religion truly are and how to abide by them.  The combination of these two types of people form a large enough majority to run the country.  In the words of Homer Simpson, "When are people going to learn?  Democracy doesn't work!"
 
In lighter political fare, I have a new favorite obscure political party.  My previous favorite was the famed Alaskan Independence Party ("Elephants and Donkeys are not native to Alaska!").  The new winner is a guy named Jimmy McMillan who was running for Mayor of New York on the RTD Party Ticket.  Click that.  For real.  And make sure you have the volume at an audible level.  It adds to the effect.  My favorite aspect of the party is that it appears that a college sophomore is president of the party and a high school senior is vice-president, both of whom I assume are daughters of Mr. McMillan.
 
And in case the RTD Party didn't cheer you up, here are a couple more fun-filled links:
 
 
 
That's all I've got for this week, other than saying that the New England Patriots are the worst losers in history.  But that was sort of a given at this point.  For now, I must go and pay my rent, which, for the record, is Too Damn High.
Monday, November 14th, 2005

Melancholy Mondays

Hey there, BBXsters, I'm baaaaaaaack :)  Sorry to deprive you of my wisdom and wit (yeah right) last week but my life is currently 100% Upside Down.  A few years ago I was going through a similar identity/life crisis and I reread what I'd written in my journal at the time, which was comforting and helpful.  A few key messages stood out to me:

1. I don't have to know where I'm going

2. Change is scary but if I take a risk and try something new, it's usually worth it

3. Just cuz I feel like everything is falling apart doesn't mean it actually is  (sometimes what feels like a breakdown can really be a breakthrough)

So yeah ? I can breathe a little easier this week and ?go with the flow? wherever that may take me (I still have no idea).  I may be somewhat inconsistent with my contributions for the next few weeks until things settle down again, so I hope everyone can understand.  In the meantime I still enjoy reading what you all write; even in my darker moods, it often makes me laugh.

 

Tuesday, NOvember 15th, 2005

Nady, how come you don't dance no more?

And I say, "ladies... ladies... it's because I'm busy as sin!"

In all of my wisdom, I have decided to add yet another occupation to my growing list of 'things that keep nady busy." For those of you keeping track, this would make four. We have the basic label of 'student' followed by the ever-time-consuming 'teacher' and 'counselor-in-training' which keeps me just as busy.

Last friday, I recieved approval from the IRB to go ahead with my cool thesis topic. Therefore, I jumped right away at the opportunity to conduct my interviews. Why? you may ask. Simple! I can use my precious students as resources. I asked if they knew anyone who came from a small town and within days I have pretty much everyone I need for my research. The problem is trying to fit these interviews into my schedule since it's already ridiculous. To make matters even more complicated, the center where I will videotape these interviews is only open until four. So what does that mean? NO CLASSES FOR NADY! The only time I can it people in is when I have class, so I took some initiative and have decided to skip class on Mondays in order to have a better chance of getting this done. But some people can't make it on Mondays, so I'm going to have to skip my tuesday course once. the scary part? Even after all this, there is STILL one person I need to schedule! I don't know what the heck kind of trick I'm going to pull with my schedule to have that one.

Speaking of ridiculous, today was most certainly eligible for 'National Ridiculous Day' due to the non-stop traffic. We have a test in Spanish class tomorrow, which means I had a ton of students begging for help. So what did I do? Did I tell them to slag off? Pfft, that may be par for the course in the spanish department, but i was raised with helping-skills. I got in early and had two office hours back to back. I even had to skip my stupid spanish class for the sake of helping out my students. Then, I went down to teach. Now, ordinarily, I would see students right after class if they were having problems, but today was the one day I had to observe a class - videotape it, no less. Yeah, that was an adventure in itself. First, I couldn't turn the damned thing on cuz the wires were all tangled up. Ten minutes into class, I start vieorecording, but there was no sound. Unfortunately, I couldn't tell this to the TA because she was in the middle of her class, so I had to wait while she gave out an activity. Turns out that even though she put the mic on, she hadn't bothered to put a battery in there. Oh well. At least we got 20 minutes of quality. whatever. I hate that class. If it weren't for thefact that this was for someone else's benefit (to write a paper based on what you see yourself doing) I wouldn't have cared.

Anyway, so after that, I rushed up to the office because I was late for my office hours. More students dropped on by and I wasn't done till 3:00. That meant that I was already half an hour late for my class. By its end at 4:30, I was dead.

To top it off, I came home and had to send off 13 emails to check on how my application materials were doing. I really hope they didn't lose any of it cuz we are way too close to the deadline.

Not only that, but I had to send my students some grammar rules to remember for tomorrow's exam.

I'm going to bed.

 

Wednesday, November 16th, 2005

Humpin it with Becker?

Today I'd like to talk about something very near and dear to my heart and that issue is adenoid adlai stevenson, and the related problems it causes when in the throes of debilitating hunger.  Keep a cup of warm water near to the pressure valve at all times in case of rampant suitcase velocity, for if not, a crowning moment of sheer vengeance will rain down a reckoning all over the jukebox, into which you had just put another dime, baby.  When you have assembled the assembly and Tab A is inserted into Slot B, then and only then shall you achieve true enlightenment of being and a servitude the likes of which Moscow has never seen.  Moscow, Utah, that is - have you ever been there in the summer?  It really is quite a nice place if you can avoid the flying fish and other such propogators of wanton lollygagging.  Look me up in the phonebook if you can get your obfuscator to work, if you do, I'll have quite the yarn to spin around a ball of yarn, if you go in for that sort of mousepad.  The final step is to listen to the delicious click-clacking of the bric-a-brac, shenanigan the pan again, and keep your toes on their toes.  It's all about the Benjamins, from Netanyahu to net-in-yahoo, do the time when it's right and keep your chin ball peen hammer.

Until next hirsute, keep your head above lofty and don't go thanking me all in one place.



Song macaroni of the week:

Guster - Parachute

 

Thursday, November 17th, 2005

 

Scott's back and thusty as ever!

 

Scott: I will write for you

Scott: but short as I am not in the mood

Bossboy X: awesome!

Scott: but just going to do it over aim

Bossboy X: awe

Scott: So the last two days I was in Huston, Tx (spelling...).  So inorder to be ready for the two days, I spent the last week just doing more work so I could take off those two days.  So besides working my ass off and getting very little sleep...

Scott: so... when I arived Sunday Afternoon/evening in Huston

Scott: I was told a shit load of wierd things about Schlumberger, and this kept me thinking all night.  It was so bad that I ended up get maybe 3 hours of sleep.  So Monday as we wondered around looking at lots of cool stuff, I probably looked stoned out of my mind.

Scott: Luckly I did not have my interview that day... but to my supprize, I was being interview all the time (Well watched).

Scott: The 4 guys showing us around, answer all the questions turned out to be 4 of the 5 guys that interviewed me

Scott: I was getting a long very well with two of them

Scott: so after a long but fun day of looking at drills and cement... and having to ware a hard hat all day long with the smallest jump sute that could have given me, I came back to my hotle tired and beat

Scott: (shair a room with a guy too, some one from Penn state)

Scott: so woke up a little bit before 8am on Tuesday

Scott: where we had to give a pressentation to the Schlumberger guys.  Every question they asked every one I could answer, and yet most of them got them wrong

Scott: I got up there and that is when it started

Scott: I got very nervious, and then sat back down right away

Scott: they called me up for an interview in an other room

Scott: and all 4 of them where there and some other guy

Scott: first question "What are you thinking right now?"

I answered: "I am very nervious."

Scott: 2nd Question: "Define leader ship?"

Me: The abblity of one person to bring the most out of people under him/her to finish a job as well as they all can... blaw blaw blaw... I pulled a little bit more of JROTC deffintions out of my hat

Scott: then one guy, the guy I had thought I got a long best with

Scott: asked "So, how would you lead a group of men that have a good 15 to 20 year of experance on you?"

Scott: I just completely blanked...

Scott: and that was the end of that...

Scott: So after that, wait for about an hour for my bus

Scott: got to Bush Internation Airport!!  Yeah... Bush...

Scott: but... it was raining like crazy

Scott: luckly the early flight was delaid so I was able to get on that

Scott: but ended up sitting on the run way for about an hour, during which I some how fell a sleep reading my control systems book.  They finally got in the air, and a little less in 2 hour I was in Chicago (just to note, that is the fast I have ever seen a plane go to Chicago, usually it is 3 to 4 hours)  We had a nice tail wind and he was booking it due to delays

Scott: but when I got to Chicago... long story short, I got screwed over by one of the AA people at one of the desk

Scott: and end up sitting in O'Hair from 7pm to 12am.  I got home at 2am.  I was just so tired, I just skipped all my classes today, but it was not because of that

Scott: I woke up around 9am, when I read the bad news... well the news I kind of figured I would get

Scott: **********************************************************************************

Please do not reply to this email. Unfortunately e-mails sent to this address cannot be answered.

 

********************************************************************************

Dear Mr. Block

 

Thank you for your interest regarding employment with Schlumberger. After carefully considering your background,qualifications and our current requirements, we feel that at the present time we do not have a position available that would satisfy both our needs. However, we will keep your application details on file for one year and if a suitable opportunity becomes available, we will not hesitate to contact you.

 

Sincerely, Schlumberger.

Scott: so after reading that... I just went back to bed and woke up at 11

Bossboy X: wow

Scott: after eating and taking shower, I got to the libary around noon to start studying (just a note: it is imposible to get any studying done in airport...)

Scott: stoped around 5 to grab something to eat

Scott: took test from 6 to 9

Scott: and then talked to group from 9 to 10 about something I talked to them last week...

Scott: READ THE FUCKING COMENTS!!!

Scott: after the nice meeting

Scott: I came home... and well now I am home... lon tiring trip... crapy day... crapy test... crapy readers... balls ass cold weather... what else can go wrong today... oh yeah... can't watch any tv... winamp is acting up...

Scott: well going to take a long hot shower and hope for a better day... but that won't happen have another test friday...

Friday, November 18th

Funky Fridays - Nando Style

actually, I don't have the same motivation as Funk does to go online and read stuff which usually ends with him linking from one page to another until he stumbles upon BBX gold (the rent is too damn high... priceless). Instead, I will talk about the only thing I have been able to focus on this whole damned semester - me.

So, today was probably the worst Spanish class ever. And it was actually very little I did to have it end up that way. Well, yesterday I had someone from my stupid "how to teach spanish" class do the video recording for my spanish section. Boy, that was fun! everyone was pretty active, they enjoyed the lesson, despite the fact that I really didn't know if it would be very effective. Today: not so much. I had a non-coordinator evaluate me (someone within the spanish department), and right from the start i knew it was not going to go well. Only 12 of 23 students showed up for some reason - and one of them was drunk! sigh. I couldn't ask her to leave because the spanish department has this stupid 5 absence policy where if you miss more than that, your grade suffers. It was bad... but it could have been worse, I suppose. Anyway, usually when I explain grammar, we can get through it in 20 minutes tops. What happens when half your class is missing? You don't have as many people shouting out correct answers so that we can move on. Thus, it took me about 35 minutes to get through the Double object Pronouns and we didn't have any time to do the activity I had planned.

I had actually toyed with the idea early on to not do the lesson that day. Not to let them leave, but to just do something else and this was mostly because the evaluator was late too! Regardless, I got some feedback from her which was pretty helpful. And it was the kind of feedback I would consider to be real feedback, unlike the crappy I-don't-know-what-that-was that my coordinator gave me back a few months ago.

The basic message this time was "you did a good job as an instructor- your lesson was good, here are a few things you can do to make things a little better." Compare that to my coordinator: "Here's what you did okay. Now let's talk about what you shouldn't have done" Almost the same basic message no? Just changes in the delivery.

I was really frustrated because half my class was missing. It wasn't that I care that much for them to HAVE to be there every day... I guess maybe I would have just wanted some sort of warning so that I could modify my lesson plans accordingly. I mean, even if we had gotten to the activity I had planned, it still would have been hard to do. I needed seven different groups (ordinarily containing 3 or more students). Today, I wouldn't have even gotten 6 sober pairs.

Whatever, I'll take the compliment I got and just move on. Speaking of compliments, while I was talking to my departmental supervisor yesterday, I couldn't help but develop somewhat of an inflated sense of awesomeness. He actually echoed something that my other supervisor, Kuldhir said once before. Back then Kuldhir said that I usually end up eliciting deeper conversations with him than any of his other supervisees. Similarly, Patrick my new supervisor put it a different way - "usually, our conversations are up here" he raises his hand and puts it on level with his eyes. "And I forget that your experience is more here," he raises his other hand to chest-level. "I just wanna make sure  don't forget that and can provide what you need in this session."

That's pretty cool that I can engage my supervisors a bit more than the average supervisee.

I end this with a note from scott...

Scott: well going to play now :-)
Bossboy X: what
Bossboy X: don't you want to talk to me
Scott: gaming time
Bossboy X: I'm nando
Scott: gaming time
Bossboy X: NANDO
Scott: I know you are nado
Bossboy X: bah!

Scott: nando
Scott: sorry
Scott: sistracted

 

 

Saturday, November 19th, 2005

Funky Saturdays 

Good morrow, everyone.  It's be like 2 months since I went on a pointlessly impassioned rant about something innocuous.  What the hell is my problem, I want my RIDICULOUSLY VERBOSE DIATRIBES, DAMN IT!!
 
With that said, I must issue a disclaimer for this week's intallment:  if you really, really, really like the holiday of Thanksgiving or get really angry with people who hurry in the Christmas season, you may find the following unsettling and may wish to read something less likely to offend your delicate sensibilities.  I'll give you this moment to do so.
 
...
 
Now that those chumps are gone, this week I feel the need to address the issue of Thanksgiving.  Basically, I think it is a really, really stupid holiday, to the point that it is not even really being considered one.
 
First off, the entire premise of Thanksgiving is rather depressing.  The basic idea is that the American populace sets aside one day every year to give thanks for what they've been given during their lives.  That sounds well and good and all, but let's take a moment to think about this.  Are there actually people who go through an entire year without setting aside any time to thank anyone, God or otherwise, for what they've been given?  Are there people so morally absymal or egotistical that they feel the world owes them every good thing anyone ever did for them and that the fates exist to provide good fortune to them in particular?  If there are no such people, then it means that the general population thanks people, God, providence, luck, or whatever they choose for at least some of the things they enjoy on a regular basis, which means there is absolutely no purpose for setting aside a special day for them to do something they do regularly.  If there are such people, what are the odds that they celebrate Thanksgiving properly?  They probably show up to the meal, shove their way to the front of the line, and then demand the largest helping of every item.  Based on its stated premise, Thanksgiving is either completely unnecessary or completely ineffective, and either way I'm not sure it's a holiday that is needed.
 
Second, the history behind Thanksgiving is, well, rather inaccurate.  Pilgrims didn't really wear those silly hats and outfits.  That was made up later.  Plymouth Rock, is in fact, a little tiny rock that one person can stand on.  It's not a giant protrusion into the ocean that a large ship can land on.  In fact, the Mayflower didn't land at Plymouth Rock at all.  They landed at Provincetown.
 
Then there's the heartwarming story of Squanto, the generous Indian who helped the Pilgrims survive the first winter.  Anybody know why Squanto was there, and how he was able to speak English?  Well, it turns out that earlier colonists (Pilgrims were not the first to Massachusetts either) had landed and decided to return to England, and Squanto decided to go with them to see their homes.  He learned English at that time.  When he returned a few years later, he found that small pox caught from the settlers had in fact destroyed his entire tribe.  He was one of the few remaining, and his tribe did indeed die out within a few generations.  He most likely helped them out because he was familiar with their culture and he and the few friends he had left needed them for survival at that point.  This, of course, kind of puts a damper on the whole "Two cultures cooperating" story we tell 2nd graders.
 
So now that I've rather demonstrated that the holiday is most likely pointless and based almost entirely on myth, let's move into the actual practice.  I, personally, like the way Thanksgiving is practiced.  People get together with their families, eat a big meal, watch some football (more on this soon), and generally make merry.  The thing is, my family does this every three weeks regardless of whether there is a holiday to go with it.  Perhaps we're a bit more close-knit than most, but we don't generally need a charade of a holiday as a background.  Most people claim to be thankful for their families on Thanksgiving, but actions speak louder than words.  If you're thankful for your family, spend more time with them.  Don't take a day once a year to claim it and then only get together for Christmas, Independence Day (a day that deserves its own column), and possibly Easter.
 
Then there's the issue of Thanksgiving entertainment.  I find it lacking.  Those who don't watch the football are left with a giant commercial masquerading as a parade, and those who do are left with the Detroit Lions.  Last year I believe the Lions lost by 28 million points to the Colts, who were led by about 16 touchdown passes by America's favorite gay cowboy quarterback.  Needless to say, unless you like watching a perennially hapless team get kicked around for a couple of hours, you're out of luck.  Compare this with the offerings of Christmas:  A Christmas Story, It's a Wonderful Life, Scrooged, National Lampoon's Christmas Vacation, The Miracle on 34th Street, any number of Charles Dickens specials (the Muppet version being my favorite), A Charlie Brown Christmasand the awesome stop motion Rudolph the Red Nosed Reindeer.  For sports fans, instead of the unwatchable Detroit Lions, we're treated to a marquee NBA matchup.  Last year th